Beth Symes
Beth Symes, CM,[1] Queen's University alumna[2] is a Canadian lawyer[1][3] who fought the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA, formerly known as Revenue Canada) all the way to the Supreme Court of Canada in an unsuccessful attempt to deduct childcare expenses she incurred in order to earn income as a partner in her law firm.
Background
[edit]Symes practised law full-time as a partner in a law firm during 1982 through 1985.[4] During that period she employed a nanny to care for her children, and deducted the wages paid to the nanny as a business expense on her personal income tax return. Revenue Canada initially allowed these deductions, but later retroactively re-assessed and disallowed them. Symes objected to the re-assessment, but CRA denied the objection.
Symes further appealed to the Federal Court, Trial Division, which ruled that the expenses were indeed valid and legitimate business expenses.
The case was further appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC), which ruled in Symes v. Canada [1993] 4 S.C.R. 695 that Symes's childcare expenses were not deductible as business expenses. Of the nine Supreme Court judges deciding the case, the two female judges dissented, but the seven males carried the majority decision.
References
[edit]- ^ a b "Beth Symes, C.M.". Order of Canada. Governor General of Canada. 16 September 2011.
{{cite web}}: Missing or empty|url=(help) - ^ "Alumna founder of LEAF named to Order of Canada". Queens University. January 2011. Archived from the original on 25 April 2011. Retrieved 30 July 2017.
- ^ "Feminist Lawyer Beth Symes made Companion of the Order of Canada". Institute for Feminist Legal Studies at Osgoode (ILFS). Osgoode Hall Law School. 18 January 2011. Retrieved 30 July 2017.
- ^ "Symes v. Canada [1993] 4 S.C.R. 695". Human & Constitutional Rights Resource Page. Arthur W. Diamond Law Library at Columbia Law School. Retrieved 31 July 2017.
 .svg){kind=small}  | This Canadian biographical article relating to law is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |